12 Angry Men
Yea this is peak fiction bro, it IS as good as everyone says it is I swear. 12 angry men paints such a detailed picture of a murder case where everything at first glance seems fairly clear cut but as it reveals its cards the case spirals out into a blurry and distorted mess (intentionally so) in such a cool way like each point made by each juror is completely reasonable but all it takes is a little bit of doubt to seed distortion amongst the case. It doesn’t really keep you guessing much but rather keeps you on your feet wondering how Henry fondle is gonna try and prove not guilty, because it’s seems so clear cut which is something I have never really seen done. Speaking of which Henry fondle was really good in this he reminded me of Atticus finch in a way. The really cool thing is we never actually see the murder so much like the jury we are forced to decide whether he is guilty or if there is some reasonable doubt. I really can’t think of any flaws with this one it was engaging even if it was only talking somehow and it took place mainly in one room, hell we don’t even know the names of the jurors until the last minute but it didn’t matter because watching the case unravel was so damn engaging. This one was like watching those stupid pieces of paper that seem fine like nothing outta the ordinary but slowly as you light the paper on fire the true message makes itself clear burn in real time