Under the Bridge

If this was a complete work of fiction, I would probably rate it higher. Because it is good, well written, well acted.  But it’s NOT a complete work of fiction. My concern with making shit like this is that general audiences are not very bright. And here, we’ve made it actively difficult to draw the line between what is real, and what has been dramatised or completely fabricated for storytelling purposes. When the subject matter is a real crime, I think that’s a little dangerous. People don’t do research, you tell em it’s a true story, and they are going to take literally everything you tell them at face value. That is worrying to me when it comes to true crime. I am just on the fence about how ethical this is.