

1988·Action·1h 38m
7.1
★













Inspector Waipong Wong has to put his life and resignation from the HKPD on hold to investigate his former partner's mysterious murder. What he and his crack team of three other cops uncover is a plot far more sinister than they originally anticipated.
Directed by Andrew Kam Yeung-Wah and Johnnie To
blackmail
hong kong

Trailer

IMDB
N/A
Where to Watch



Cast

Waise Lee Chi-Hung
John Wong Wai-Pong

Joey Wong
Ada

Matthew Wong Hin-Mung
Lun Kwok-Keung

Phillip Kwok Chui
Kam

Paul Chu Kong
Han Ching

Betty Mak Chui-Han
Maggie

Peter Lai Bei-Dak
Peter Ng

Kirk Wong Chi-Keung
Drug Dealer

Michael Chow Man-Kin
Scar-Faced Assassin

Roy Cheung Yiu-Yeung
Mr. Ho's Bodyguard

Robin Shou
Assassin at Hospital

Stuart Yung Sai-Kit
Ho Ka-Nin
Crew

Johnnie To
Director

Gordon Chan
Writer

Lo Ta-Yu
Original Music Composer

David Wu
Original Music Composer

David Wu
Editor

Tsui Hark
Producer

Raymond Wong Pak-Ming
Producer

Lowell Lo Koon-Ting
Theme Song Performance
Popular Reviews
5 reviews
mindofaustin
6.0★ · 06/21/26

this was cheesier than my uncle’s jokes at thanksgiving. way too fast paced, almost every scene felt like it was going 200 mph. although the action sequences were pretty sick and the lead performances were really strong, so i still had a decently fun time
this was cheesier than my uncle’s jokes at thanksgiving. way too fast paced, almost every scene felt like it was going 200 mph. although the action sequences were pretty sick and the lead performances were really strong, so i still had a decently fun time
Enzo
7.0★ · 04/06/26

REALLY FUN!! Really well shot and really good choreo and really epic deaths
REALLY FUN!! Really well shot and really good choreo and really epic deaths
bisho
8.0★ · 03/31/26

The relatively generic plot is definitely elevated by the cast. I had a good time watching this.
Also the gore is insane.
Also the gore is insane.
The relatively generic plot is definitely elevated by the cast. I had a good time watching this.
Also the gore is insane.
Also the gore is insane.
jamblo
6.0★ · 01/12/25

Another installment of 'Sundays on Fire' at the Nitehawk and one I'd not seen before, which was nice.
The film credits two directors, though there were at least three (and wiki even suggests a fourth) and, though I wouldn't presume to imply I could tell who directed what specific scenes, it is pretty clear that the production was, let's say, complicated -- the film is all over the place tonally and there are plot setups which are abandoned in favor of set-pieces, some of which are legitimately incoherently filmed. On the other hand, it's cool to see Waise Lee playing a good guy (even if he's a dick about it), some of the set-pieces are actually pretty great, and it keeps its half-baked romance subplot under control (something many films of the era don't manage to do, preferring to wallow in their sentimentality). Interestingly, it's also got an elevator shaft sequence not too dissimilar from the one in 'Die Hard' (also a 1988 film). Plus, there's an amusing Tsui Hark cameo at the end.
Also, there's something else worth pointing out about the plot: for an 80s film, particularly an HK one, it handles its homosexuality plotline with a little more finesse than usual. Let me first say that, yes, some of the film's characters, particularly the police ones, are happy to exploit someone's sexuality for their own gain and the way they do this is horrible, but I don't believe the film share this homophobia; it's absent both the squeamishness and the weak attempts at humor that would be in attendance in most films of the era. It's not a shining paragon of tolerance but, given the way the industry as a whole was operating, it is noteworthy.
The print we saw looked pretty clean, though there were some choppy reel changes and I see that others at the screening have implied there may have been missing scenes -- I'm not sure about that but, to be honest, given the number of hands involved in the making out, it seems just as plausible that it wasn't fully finished. But, again, I don't know.
It's gory, but more so in the shocking way, rather than the bloody one (though it is bloody), it's convoluted, it doesn't quite make sense, and it was fun to see in a cinema.
Oh, it has a chase scene where one character picks up a child and literally throws that kid at the guy pursuing him, so there's that....
The film credits two directors, though there were at least three (and wiki even suggests a fourth) and, though I wouldn't presume to imply I could tell who directed what specific scenes, it is pretty clear that the production was, let's say, complicated -- the film is all over the place tonally and there are plot setups which are abandoned in favor of set-pieces, some of which are legitimately incoherently filmed. On the other hand, it's cool to see Waise Lee playing a good guy (even if he's a dick about it), some of the set-pieces are actually pretty great, and it keeps its half-baked romance subplot under control (something many films of the era don't manage to do, preferring to wallow in their sentimentality). Interestingly, it's also got an elevator shaft sequence not too dissimilar from the one in 'Die Hard' (also a 1988 film). Plus, there's an amusing Tsui Hark cameo at the end.
Also, there's something else worth pointing out about the plot: for an 80s film, particularly an HK one, it handles its homosexuality plotline with a little more finesse than usual. Let me first say that, yes, some of the film's characters, particularly the police ones, are happy to exploit someone's sexuality for their own gain and the way they do this is horrible, but I don't believe the film share this homophobia; it's absent both the squeamishness and the weak attempts at humor that would be in attendance in most films of the era. It's not a shining paragon of tolerance but, given the way the industry as a whole was operating, it is noteworthy.
The print we saw looked pretty clean, though there were some choppy reel changes and I see that others at the screening have implied there may have been missing scenes -- I'm not sure about that but, to be honest, given the number of hands involved in the making out, it seems just as plausible that it wasn't fully finished. But, again, I don't know.
It's gory, but more so in the shocking way, rather than the bloody one (though it is bloody), it's convoluted, it doesn't quite make sense, and it was fun to see in a cinema.
Oh, it has a chase scene where one character picks up a child and literally throws that kid at the guy pursuing him, so there's that....
Another installment of 'Sundays on Fire' at the Nitehawk and one I'd not seen before, which was nice.
The film credits two directors, though there were at least three (and wiki even suggests a fourth) and, though I wouldn't presume to imply I could tell who directed what specific scenes, it is pretty clear that the production was, let's say, complicated -- the film is all over the place tonally and there are plot setups which are abandoned in favor of set-pieces, some of which are legitimately incoherently filmed. On the other hand, it's cool to see Waise Lee playing a good guy (even if he's a dick about it), some of the set-pieces are actually pretty great, and it keeps its half-baked romance subplot under control (something many films of the era don't manage to do, preferring to wallow in their sentimentality). Interestingly, it's also got an elevator shaft sequence not too dissimilar from the one in 'Die Hard' (also a 1988 film). Plus, there's an amusing Tsui Hark cameo at the end.
Also, there's something else worth pointing out about the plot: for an 80s film, particularly an HK one, it handles its homosexuality plotline with a little more finesse than usual. Let me first say that, yes, some of the film's characters, particularly the police ones, are happy to exploit someone's sexuality for their own gain and the way they do this is horrible, but I don't believe the film share this homophobia; it's absent both the squeamishness and the weak attempts at humor that would be in attendance in most films of the era. It's not a shining paragon of tolerance but, given the way the industry as a whole was operating, it is noteworthy.
The print we saw looked pretty clean, though there were some choppy reel changes and I see that others at the screening have implied there may have been missing scenes -- I'm not sure about that but, to be honest, given the number of hands involved in the making out, it seems just as plausible that it wasn't fully finished. But, again, I don't know.
It's gory, but more so in the shocking way, rather than the bloody one (though it is bloody), it's convoluted, it doesn't quite make sense, and it was fun to see in a cinema.
Oh, it has a chase scene where one character picks up a child and literally throws that kid at the guy pursuing him, so there's that....
The film credits two directors, though there were at least three (and wiki even suggests a fourth) and, though I wouldn't presume to imply I could tell who directed what specific scenes, it is pretty clear that the production was, let's say, complicated -- the film is all over the place tonally and there are plot setups which are abandoned in favor of set-pieces, some of which are legitimately incoherently filmed. On the other hand, it's cool to see Waise Lee playing a good guy (even if he's a dick about it), some of the set-pieces are actually pretty great, and it keeps its half-baked romance subplot under control (something many films of the era don't manage to do, preferring to wallow in their sentimentality). Interestingly, it's also got an elevator shaft sequence not too dissimilar from the one in 'Die Hard' (also a 1988 film). Plus, there's an amusing Tsui Hark cameo at the end.
Also, there's something else worth pointing out about the plot: for an 80s film, particularly an HK one, it handles its homosexuality plotline with a little more finesse than usual. Let me first say that, yes, some of the film's characters, particularly the police ones, are happy to exploit someone's sexuality for their own gain and the way they do this is horrible, but I don't believe the film share this homophobia; it's absent both the squeamishness and the weak attempts at humor that would be in attendance in most films of the era. It's not a shining paragon of tolerance but, given the way the industry as a whole was operating, it is noteworthy.
The print we saw looked pretty clean, though there were some choppy reel changes and I see that others at the screening have implied there may have been missing scenes -- I'm not sure about that but, to be honest, given the number of hands involved in the making out, it seems just as plausible that it wasn't fully finished. But, again, I don't know.
It's gory, but more so in the shocking way, rather than the bloody one (though it is bloody), it's convoluted, it doesn't quite make sense, and it was fun to see in a cinema.
Oh, it has a chase scene where one character picks up a child and literally throws that kid at the guy pursuing him, so there's that....
Noweyy
8.0★ · 03/14/26
