Albert's stable relationship with his fiancé is jeopardized when he becomes obsessed with a computer simulation.
Directed by Louise Weard
computer program
online dating
Trailer
IMDB
N/A
Letterboxd
3.3 / 5
Cast
Louise Weard
Albert
Crew
Louise Weard
Director
Louise Weard
Writer
Louise Weard
Editor
Louise Weard
Director of Photography
Louise Weard
Producer
Popular Reviews
6 reviews
hazel
8.0★ · 07/31/25
i wanna fuck my computer or whatever ninajirachi said
i wanna fuck my computer or whatever ninajirachi said
Dan
6.0★ · 02/13/24
Why, god tell me why did i watch this on my tv with my parents at home
Why, god tell me why did i watch this on my tv with my parents at home
Francisco Padilla
5.0★ · 11/11/23
This film wears the Cronenberg’s influence on its sleeves, not necessarily a bad thing, but it’s something that I quickly noticed when viewing the film.This film has a fun interesting idea that right off the bat discusses pornography on the internet and the way we consume media, at least that how I personally saw the film (keep note I saw the 40 minute cut, I understand that there is other cuts of this film). I did have quite a bit of problems with the editing and the way scenes seem to drag on with a very flashing style of editing. It seems as if it wants to be a narrative film at points then cuts to experimental filmmaking, this combination kinda ruins the film.
I’ve noticed with a lot of films by this filmmaker, there seems to be an issue with editing in general. I don’t mean to discourage the way she directs and edits but at the same time, it honestly makes the work very pretentious and edgy. Having a darker undertone and having disturbing segments is awesome, but I at the same time this entire film and many others by the director always give off the vibes that what is being done is extremely taboo or disturbing, and honestly, it’s really not.
I feel as if most of her films fall in the category that “i’m edgy” or “this is fucked” but it’s honestly just blown out of proportions. I believe this director also made a montage of castrations as a project? I want to check out more of her work but at the same time the whole overly edgy nature and disturbed nature is very irritating. It gives me the vibes of a film student that is just over their own head and they simply just need to be told and directed to focus.
But yeah…nice effects :)
This film wears the Cronenberg’s influence on its sleeves, not necessarily a bad thing, but it’s something that I quickly noticed when viewing the film.This film has a fun interesting idea that right off the bat discusses pornography on the internet and the way we consume media, at least that how I personally saw the film (keep note I saw the 40 minute cut, I understand that there is other cuts of this film). I did have quite a bit of problems with the editing and the way scenes seem to drag on with a very flashing style of editing. It seems as if it wants to be a narrative film at points then cuts to experimental filmmaking, this combination kinda ruins the film.
I’ve noticed with a lot of films by this filmmaker, there seems to be an issue with editing in general. I don’t mean to discourage the way she directs and edits but at the same time, it honestly makes the work very pretentious and edgy. Having a darker undertone and having disturbing segments is awesome, but I at the same time this entire film and many others by the director always give off the vibes that what is being done is extremely taboo or disturbing, and honestly, it’s really not.
I feel as if most of her films fall in the category that “i’m edgy” or “this is fucked” but it’s honestly just blown out of proportions. I believe this director also made a montage of castrations as a project? I want to check out more of her work but at the same time the whole overly edgy nature and disturbed nature is very irritating. It gives me the vibes of a film student that is just over their own head and they simply just need to be told and directed to focus.
