The Stone Cross backdrop

The Stone Cross

1968·Drama·1h 16m
7.1
In 1890s Western Ukraine, Ivan Didukh, a proud and ripe Galician farmer, has decided to abandon his ancestral home to emigrate to Canada in search of a better life. His final hours are clouded by both internal and communal discord as his village convenes to ceremonially mark his departure. The celebrations that echo those of a funeral, forecast the imminent death of a man estranged from his motherland, and of an antiquated way of life on the cusp of obsoletion.
Directed by Leonid Osyka

Cast

Danylo Ilchenko
Danylo Ilchenko
Ivan
Boryslav Brondukov
Boryslav Brondukov
Boryslav Brondukov
Ivan Mykolaichuk
Ivan Mykolaichuk
Mykola
Kostiantyn Stepankov
Kostiantyn Stepankov
Mykhailo
Vasyl Symchych
Vasyl Symchych
Gazda Heorhiy
Borys Savchenko
Borys Savchenko
Dmytro
Oleksa Atamanyuk
Oleksa Atamanyuk
Son
Antonina Leftiy
Antonina Leftiy
Antonina

Crew

Leonid Osyka
Leonid Osyka
Director
Ivan Drach
Ivan Drach
Screenplay
Volodymyr Huba
Volodymyr Huba
Music
Vasyl Stefanyk
Vasyl Stefanyk
Short Story

Popular Reviews

10 reviews
Nick
Nick
The Stone Cross
The film has essentially two main scenes: an interrogation scene with a suspected thief and a celebration scene surrounding the protagonist’s departure to Canada. There is a scene in between these two about the titular stone cross Ivan erects. The first prolonged interrogation scene struck me most. It captured the dynamics of power: capturer and captive. The captive unquestionably believed he would die and so we get to see him process, through alcohol, his proximity to death. We also observe his captors, with cultural specifics to a hyper small village like this. The stone cross’s erection and subsequent extended festivities failed to connect to me in a broader conceptual sense. The celebration/going-away party was particularly unstructured and just kinda swayed through sentiments. Ultimately, i never fully latched onto our protagonist and so his journey was always, at least, at arms length.
The film has essentially two main scenes: an interrogation scene with a suspected thief and a celebration scene surrounding the protagonist’s departure to Canada. There is a scene in between these two about the titular stone cross Ivan erects. The first prolonged interrogation scene struck me most. It captured the dynamics of power: capturer and captive. The captive unquestionably believed he would die and so we get to see him process, through alcohol, his proximity to death. We also observe his captors, with cultural specifics to a hyper small village like this. The stone cross’s erection and subsequent extended festivities failed to connect to me in a broader conceptual sense. The celebration/going-away party was particularly unstructured and just kinda swayed through sentiments. Ultimately, i never fully latched onto our protagonist and so his journey was always, at least, at arms length.
Favorite
Comment
masha zinchenko
masha zinchenko
The Stone Cross
памʼятаю, як у школі на уроці української літератури вчителька показала цей мастерпіз. у шоках були усі. власне, нічого відтоді не змінилося, я досі в повному захваті
памʼятаю, як у школі на уроці української літератури вчителька показала цей мастерпіз. у шоках були усі. власне, нічого відтоді не змінилося, я досі в повному захваті
Favorite
Comment
nastiaPRO
The Stone Cross
Favorite
Comment
yeva
yeva
The Stone Cross
Favorite
Comment
H
H
The Stone Cross
Favorite
Comment
The Stone Cross (1968) | Flick