Blood Feast is an impactful horror film, being the first Technicolor horror film with gore. While we did have films like Psycho three years earlier, this is the first film where we see red colored blood. And we get a lot of it. This is a wild “splatter” film, that sticks to what it tries to be, and that is a bloody horror film. The acting is terrible, and the story is confusing, but it seems like no one on set cared about making a good film, rather a historic film for the horror genre.

Blood Feast is an impactful horror film, being the first Technicolor horror film with gore. While we did have films like Psycho three years earlier, this is the first film where we see red colored blood. And we get a lot of it. This is a wild “splatter” film, that sticks to what it tries to be, and that is a bloody horror film. The acting is terrible, and the story is confusing, but it seems like no one on set cared about making a good film, rather a historic film for the horror genre.

considered the first splatter film ever made, it’s definitely not good.. but like i respect it i guess?

i did try to enjoy it more: due to my major infatuation with the horror genre, particularly the more grotesque ones (body horrors/splatters) but this really wasn’t doing it for me, at all. it certainly holds historical significance as it pushes boundaries of amount fake blood within film, and every horror fanatic should watch it.. but it’s just not good. it’s filled with hammy, even terrible acting, the dialogue is awful, and it just has a really cheap feel filled with technical flaws (i’ll cut the slack, since its independent) but i think this unintentionally makes quite an hilariously bad experience, which i’d rather have than a boring one. the gore effects are dated, but i can’t fault them much considering they were the best parts of the movie easily. brains being mashed out, tongue ripping, leg removal. the direction felt non-existent, and it lacks any development or suspense. i’ve got to say, the gore gore girls by the same director gave me false hope for this flick: but yeah no.

considered the first splatter film ever made, it’s definitely not good.. but like i respect it i guess?

i did try to enjoy it more: due to my major infatuation with the horror genre, particularly the more grotesque ones (body horrors/splatters) but this really wasn’t doing it for me, at all. it certainly holds historical significance as it pushes boundaries of amount fake blood within film, and every horror fanatic should watch it.. but it’s just not good. it’s filled with hammy, even terrible acting, the dialogue is awful, and it just has a really cheap feel filled with technical flaws (i’ll cut the slack, since its independent) but i think this unintentionally makes quite an hilariously bad experience, which i’d rather have than a boring one. the gore effects are dated, but i can’t fault them much considering they were the best parts of the movie easily. brains being mashed out, tongue ripping, leg removal. the direction felt non-existent, and it lacks any development or suspense. i’ve got to say, the gore gore girls by the same director gave me false hope for this flick: but yeah no.

considered the first splatter film ever made, it’s definitely not good.. but like i respect it i guess?

i did try to enjoy it more: due to my major infatuation with the horror genre, particularly the more grotesque ones (body horrors/splatters) but this really wasn’t doing it for me, at all. it certainly holds historical significance as it pushes boundaries of amount fake blood within film, and every horror fanatic should watch it.. but it’s just not good. it’s filled with hammy, even terrible acting, the dialogue is awful, and it just has a really cheap feel filled with technical flaws (i’ll cut the slack, since its independent) but i think this unintentionally makes quite an hilariously bad experience, which i’d rather have than a boring one. the gore effects are dated, but i can’t fault them much considering they were the best parts of the movie easily. brains being mashed out, tongue ripping, leg removal. the direction felt non-existent, and it lacks any development or suspense. i’ve got to say, the gore gore girls by the same director gave me false hope for this flick: but yeah no.

considered the first splatter film ever made, it’s definitely not good.. but like i respect it i guess?

i did try to enjoy it more: due to my major infatuation with the horror genre, particularly the more grotesque ones (body horrors/splatters) but this really wasn’t doing it for me, at all. it certainly holds historical significance as it pushes boundaries of amount fake blood within film, and every horror fanatic should watch it.. but it’s just not good. it’s filled with hammy, even terrible acting, the dialogue is awful, and it just has a really cheap feel filled with technical flaws (i’ll cut the slack, since its independent) but i think this unintentionally makes quite an hilariously bad experience, which i’d rather have than a boring one. the gore effects are dated, but i can’t fault them much considering they were the best parts of the movie easily. brains being mashed out, tongue ripping, leg removal. the direction felt non-existent, and it lacks any development or suspense. i’ve got to say, the gore gore girls by the same director gave me false hope for this flick: but yeah no.

Honestly…not enough of a feast? More like a blood dinner

Honestly…not enough of a feast? More like a blood dinner

fun(ny) stuff.

fun(ny) stuff.