Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980 backdrop
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980 logo
2009·Thriller·1h 33m
7.0
After 6 years of brutal murders, the West Yorkshire Police fear that they may have already interviewed The Ripper and let him back into the world to continue his reign of terror upon the citizens of Yorkshire. Assistant Chief Constable of the Manchester Police, Peter Hunter, is called in to oversee the West Yorkshire Police's Ripper investigation and see what they could have missed.
Directed by James Marsh
hotel
based on novel or book
press conference
yorkshire
murder
serial killer
police corruption
christmas
1980s
copycat killer

Cast

Paddy Considine
Paddy Considine
Peter Hunter
Warren Clarke
Warren Clarke
Bill Molloy
Maxine Peake
Maxine Peake
Helen Marshall
James Fox
James Fox
Philip Evans
David Calder
David Calder
Sir John Marsden
Nicholas Woodeson
Nicholas Woodeson
Michael Warren
Tony Pitts
Tony Pitts
John Nolan
Jim Carter
Jim Carter
Harold Angus
David Morrissey
David Morrissey
Maurice Jobson
Eddie Marsan
Eddie Marsan
Jack Whitehead
Sean Harris
Sean Harris
Bob Craven
Tony Mooney
Tony Mooney
Tommy Douglas

Crew

James Marsh
James Marsh
Director
Tony Grisoni
Tony Grisoni
Writer
Dickon Hinchliffe
Dickon Hinchliffe
Original Music Composer
Andrew Eaton
Andrew Eaton
Producer
Peter Hampden
Peter Hampden
Executive Producer
Liza Marshall
Liza Marshall
Executive Producer
Nina Gold
Nina Gold
Casting
Charlotte Walter
Charlotte Walter
Costume Design
Paul Hyett
Paul Hyett
Special Effects Makeup Artist

Popular Reviews

54 reviews
Ronson McButtons
Ronson McButtonsPRO
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980
Not as good as the first, it’s directed slightly worse and lacks that descent into madness that the first one has through its nightmarish dreamlike existential direction. Paddy Considine is great though as expected and Sean Harris is right dirty bastard!
Not as good as the first, it’s directed slightly worse and lacks that descent into madness that the first one has through its nightmarish dreamlike existential direction. Paddy Considine is great though as expected and Sean Harris is right dirty bastard!
Favorite
Comment
jas
jas
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980
idek if i cba to watch part 3

yeah im coworker clarting even though i have a wife and kids

kind of a let down ngl was suuuuper interested in the yorkshire ripper cases not that long ago and this didnt do it justice cus it focused on everything but the case

still a decent movie about working against police injustices i just really prefer the first one currently

nice linkup to the last movie tho x
idek if i cba to watch part 3

yeah im coworker clarting even though i have a wife and kids

kind of a let down ngl was suuuuper interested in the yorkshire ripper cases not that long ago and this didnt do it justice cus it focused on everything but the case

still a decent movie about working against police injustices i just really prefer the first one currently

nice linkup to the last movie tho x
Favorite
Comment
Miles v
Miles v
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980
Somehow very different from the first one (not only because the story is too different), this one felt like an episode of Touch of cloth the British modern police show parody (hilarious and really good btw), but for a serious movie this isn’t a compliment.
Somehow very different from the first one (not only because the story is too different), this one felt like an episode of Touch of cloth the British modern police show parody (hilarious and really good btw), but for a serious movie this isn’t a compliment.
Favorite
Comment
vConqueror
vConquerorPRO
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980
Ffs these are all gonna be miserable, aren’t they 🫩
Somewhat prefer this to the first, if only because it mainly gets depressing towards the end rather than early on 😂
Ffs these are all gonna be miserable, aren’t they 🫩
Somewhat prefer this to the first, if only because it mainly gets depressing towards the end rather than early on 😂
Favorite
Comment
Sean
Sean
Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1980
Even with Paddy Considine’s best efforts in the lead and a story that pays off in the end I’m sad to say this was a pretty significant step down for me. One of my biggest issues is with the way this story was paced, really nothing in the story progresses until less than twenty minutes in the runtime and even though I loved those last twenty and what they did with the story I can’t get past how much of this was empty. Even while considering the story’s faults they doesn’t compare to my biggest gripe with the movie, I rarely struggle with this alley of filmmaking so when I do I know it’s really bad, the editing here has some very rough stretches where it’s some of the worst I’ve ever seen in a 21st century film and others where its on the same level of the first, it made for a very weird and confusing experience overall. So much of it is cut roughly and doesn’t allow for the cinematography to shine which was one of my favorite things about the first movie, that technical piece of this struggling was the biggest letdown out of everything here. There is still a lot to enjoy though, I don’t want this to be a negative review because I’m still giving it a 3, the script is the same quality as the first and even though Garfield is sorely missed I loved Paddy and I’m glad Sean Harris became more of a central character because he was sparingly used in the first and that disappointed me a bit. The dark atmosphere is also toned down in this one but it’s still reminiscently there, the final twenty minutes really brought it back for me and give me a willpower to watch the final one tonight that I was worried I wouldn’t have as this went on. All in all it’s not great but it’s still a mystery thriller that comes with a decent pay-off, solid writing, and a great cast, I have no clue where the story could go from here so I’m as intrigued as I am excited to cap off this trilogy.
Even with Paddy Considine’s best efforts in the lead and a story that pays off in the end I’m sad to say this was a pretty significant step down for me. One of my biggest issues is with the way this story was paced, really nothing in the story progresses until less than twenty minutes in the runtime and even though I loved those last twenty and what they did with the story I can’t get past how much of this was empty. Even while considering the story’s faults they doesn’t compare to my biggest gripe with the movie, I rarely struggle with this alley of filmmaking so when I do I know it’s really bad, the editing here has some very rough stretches where it’s some of the worst I’ve ever seen in a 21st century film and others where its on the same level of the first, it made for a very weird and confusing experience overall. So much of it is cut roughly and doesn’t allow for the cinematography to shine which was one of my favorite things about the first movie, that technical piece of this struggling was the biggest letdown out of everything here. There is still a lot to enjoy though, I don’t want this to be a negative review because I’m still giving it a 3, the script is the same quality as the first and even though Garfield is sorely missed I loved Paddy and I’m glad Sean Harris became more of a central character because he was sparingly used in the first and that disappointed me a bit. The dark atmosphere is also toned down in this one but it’s still reminiscently there, the final twenty minutes really brought it back for me and give me a willpower to watch the final one tonight that I was worried I wouldn’t have as this went on. All in all it’s not great but it’s still a mystery thriller that comes with a decent pay-off, solid writing, and a great cast, I have no clue where the story could go from here so I’m as intrigued as I am excited to cap off this trilogy.
Favorite
Comment