Imagens

A very successful “experiment” in which Rosemberg managed to implicitly make the spectator an accomplice of the oppressor, hence the lack of sound, but it is not only limited to implications, since it freely switches between actionism, happening & symbolism creating a portray regarding violence & oppression with its counterparts like poetry & freedom, which is a cry for the latter, essential free cinema.

A very successful “experiment” in which Rosemberg managed to implicitly make the spectator an accomplice of the oppressor, hence the lack of sound, but it is not only limited to implications, since it freely switches between actionism, happening & symbolism creating a portray regarding violence & oppression with its counterparts like poetry & freedom, which is a cry for the latter, essential free cinema.

A very successful “experiment” in which Rosemberg managed to implicitly make the spectator an accomplice of the oppressor, hence the lack of sound, but it is not only limited to implications, since it freely switches between actionism, happening & symbolism creating a portray regarding violence & oppression with its counterparts like poetry & freedom, which is a cry for the latter, essential free cinema.

A very successful “experiment” in which Rosemberg managed to implicitly make the spectator an accomplice of the oppressor, hence the lack of sound, but it is not only limited to implications, since it freely switches between actionism, happening & symbolism creating a portray regarding violence & oppression with its counterparts like poetry & freedom, which is a cry for the latter, essential free cinema.