
Oleanna
1994·Drama·1h 27m
7.0
★





Carol, a college student, comes to John's office, her professor, to discuss the grade she has received for one of her papers.
Directed by David Mamet
based on play or musical
college student
college professor

Trailer

IMDB
N/A
Where to Watch



Cast

William H. Macy
John

Debra Eisenstadt
Carol
Crew

David Mamet
Director

David Mamet
Screenplay

Rebecca Pidgeon
Original Music Composer

Andrzej Sekula
Director of Photography

Sarah Green
Producer

Sandy Reynolds-Wasco
Production Design

David Wasco
Production Design

Michael Jackman
Post Production Supervisor

David Mamet
Theatre Play

David Mamet
Lyricist
Popular Reviews
17 reviews
Bekah
5.0★ · 04/26/23

Funny how so much of the discourse around this one seems to contend that they’re both right when the real answer is— they’re both wrong! Whether you’re in the “don’t be an anti-intellectual” or “don’t be an elitist” camp, the real moral of the story— don’t be a dick!
Looking forward to watching some real movies again, Mamet likes his own words a little too much.
Looking forward to watching some real movies again, Mamet likes his own words a little too much.
Funny how so much of the discourse around this one seems to contend that they’re both right when the real answer is— they’re both wrong! Whether you’re in the “don’t be an anti-intellectual” or “don’t be an elitist” camp, the real moral of the story— don’t be a dick!
Looking forward to watching some real movies again, Mamet likes his own words a little too much.
Looking forward to watching some real movies again, Mamet likes his own words a little too much.
Nicole
3.0★ · 11/26/22

Too much yelling!!!! Chill!!!!
Too much yelling!!!! Chill!!!!
Jack J
1.8★ · 02/18/21

Watched for class, and oh boy. I’m glad this didn’t come out at the time of Film Twitter, or else this would be the most divisive film of all time.
I come at this having read the original play, and actually really liking it. It’s got a lot of issues, for sure, but what it lacks in cohesive characterization and subtlety it makes up for, in the words of Mamet himself, with “brass balls”. It’s a play that inspires conversation and takes big swings, and while not all of them hit, I have to give credit where credit is due. The play is brave, original, and at least leaves some of the material up to the audiences interpretation.
This? This has none of that.
The film is significantly more pointed than the original source material, and takes away the majority of what I found interesting. It never gets the audience talking because Mamet is too busy telling the audience how to feel and who to feel for. Considering that the audience, judging from other reviews on this site, side with John, Mamet did his job. However, this does not alleviate Mamet of the questionability of having the audience side with John. It’s something that didn’t sit well with me in the play, but is excruciating to get through here.
The film makes an interesting companion piece to Malcolm and Marie, as both suffer the same primary issue. The director, in this case Mamet himself, uses the characters as mouthpieces to spit off their views of the world, which prevents them from becoming fully fleshed out characters.
However, the thing that bugged me most about the film were that the changes to the source material make the film worse. This is not to say that adaptations should not make changes, but changes that undermine the point and project of the source material is a bad idea all around.
I come at this having read the original play, and actually really liking it. It’s got a lot of issues, for sure, but what it lacks in cohesive characterization and subtlety it makes up for, in the words of Mamet himself, with “brass balls”. It’s a play that inspires conversation and takes big swings, and while not all of them hit, I have to give credit where credit is due. The play is brave, original, and at least leaves some of the material up to the audiences interpretation.
This? This has none of that.
The film is significantly more pointed than the original source material, and takes away the majority of what I found interesting. It never gets the audience talking because Mamet is too busy telling the audience how to feel and who to feel for. Considering that the audience, judging from other reviews on this site, side with John, Mamet did his job. However, this does not alleviate Mamet of the questionability of having the audience side with John. It’s something that didn’t sit well with me in the play, but is excruciating to get through here.
The film makes an interesting companion piece to Malcolm and Marie, as both suffer the same primary issue. The director, in this case Mamet himself, uses the characters as mouthpieces to spit off their views of the world, which prevents them from becoming fully fleshed out characters.
However, the thing that bugged me most about the film were that the changes to the source material make the film worse. This is not to say that adaptations should not make changes, but changes that undermine the point and project of the source material is a bad idea all around.
Watched for class, and oh boy. I’m glad this didn’t come out at the time of Film Twitter, or else this would be the most divisive film of all time.
I come at this having read the original play, and actually really liking it. It’s got a lot of issues, for sure, but what it lacks in cohesive characterization and subtlety it makes up for, in the words of Mamet himself, with “brass balls”. It’s a play that inspires conversation and takes big swings, and while not all of them hit, I have to give credit where credit is due. The play is brave, original, and at least leaves some of the material up to the audiences interpretation.
This? This has none of that.
The film is significantly more pointed than the original source material, and takes away the majority of what I found interesting. It never gets the audience talking because Mamet is too busy telling the audience how to feel and who to feel for. Considering that the audience, judging from other reviews on this site, side with John, Mamet did his job. However, this does not alleviate Mamet of the questionability of having the audience side with John. It’s something that didn’t sit well with me in the play, but is excruciating to get through here.
The film makes an interesting companion piece to Malcolm and Marie, as both suffer the same primary issue. The director, in this case Mamet himself, uses the characters as mouthpieces to spit off their views of the world, which prevents them from becoming fully fleshed out characters.
However, the thing that bugged me most about the film were that the changes to the source material make the film worse. This is not to say that adaptations should not make changes, but changes that undermine the point and project of the source material is a bad idea all around.
I come at this having read the original play, and actually really liking it. It’s got a lot of issues, for sure, but what it lacks in cohesive characterization and subtlety it makes up for, in the words of Mamet himself, with “brass balls”. It’s a play that inspires conversation and takes big swings, and while not all of them hit, I have to give credit where credit is due. The play is brave, original, and at least leaves some of the material up to the audiences interpretation.
This? This has none of that.
The film is significantly more pointed than the original source material, and takes away the majority of what I found interesting. It never gets the audience talking because Mamet is too busy telling the audience how to feel and who to feel for. Considering that the audience, judging from other reviews on this site, side with John, Mamet did his job. However, this does not alleviate Mamet of the questionability of having the audience side with John. It’s something that didn’t sit well with me in the play, but is excruciating to get through here.
The film makes an interesting companion piece to Malcolm and Marie, as both suffer the same primary issue. The director, in this case Mamet himself, uses the characters as mouthpieces to spit off their views of the world, which prevents them from becoming fully fleshed out characters.
However, the thing that bugged me most about the film were that the changes to the source material make the film worse. This is not to say that adaptations should not make changes, but changes that undermine the point and project of the source material is a bad idea all around.
pojiraaa
6.0★ · 03/17/26

lauren
2.0★ · 02/26/26
