

1981·Horror·1h 35m
7.0
★







Otherworldly creatures inhabit the bootlegging tunnels underneath a small town mining community, and they kill any of the townsfolk who invade their home.
Directed by James L. Conway

Trailer

IMDB
N/A
Where to Watch



Cast

Rebecca Balding
Trish Michaels

Fred McCarren
Mark Kinner

Anne-Marie Martin
Jessica Ford

Jeff Harlan
Roger Lowrie

John Crawford
Brian Deering

Med Flory
Dan Ostroff

Jon Lormer
Greenwalt, the old man
Crew

James L. Conway
Director

Jim Kouf
Screenplay

Charles E. Sellier Jr.
Producer

Eliza Coleman
Stunt Double
Popular Reviews
13 reviews
The
7.0★ · 02/10/25

"Cozy" horror is perhaps the genre descriptor quickest to devolve into practical meaninglessness but that's fine since it's not really an academic or functional delineation to start with. Sure, you could write a whole book about how a certain pockets of horror induce coziness and how a lot of it has to do with capitalism cheapening every material aspect of our lives - the sweaters in these movies are real wool, the middle class mis-en-scene isn't filled with mass produced junk, the houses have character, etc. Usually there's an absence of winking irony - though not an absence of humor - and definitely nothing too extreme in terms of real world ugliness. Languid pacing. Environment often plays a part as characters cozy up in remote cabins, old houses, etc. I tend to think of '70s-'80s stuff but there's definitely arguments for earlier movies. When more recent movies start getting described as cozy is where I feel we lose the term. It starts meaning, "this movie is cozy because it is familiar to me from when I was younger and is comforting to rewatch." Even movies with zero sweaters in them.
Soot rings around the wall-mounted, corded phone. Vinyl tablecloths and peeling wallpaper. Thermals under flannels under flannels under puff parkas. One of cinema's all time greatest "little stinker" dogs. Sweet and genuine where other movies would've been way sleazier. Slow rolls its central monster mayhem but the rest of the movie is so charming you don't mind that the tentacle turtles are kind of immobile and silly looking. I'd say this is archetypal cozy horror.
Soot rings around the wall-mounted, corded phone. Vinyl tablecloths and peeling wallpaper. Thermals under flannels under flannels under puff parkas. One of cinema's all time greatest "little stinker" dogs. Sweet and genuine where other movies would've been way sleazier. Slow rolls its central monster mayhem but the rest of the movie is so charming you don't mind that the tentacle turtles are kind of immobile and silly looking. I'd say this is archetypal cozy horror.
"Cozy" horror is perhaps the genre descriptor quickest to devolve into practical meaninglessness but that's fine since it's not really an academic or functional delineation to start with. Sure, you could write a whole book about how a certain pockets of horror induce coziness and how a lot of it has to do with capitalism cheapening every material aspect of our lives - the sweaters in these movies are real wool, the middle class mis-en-scene isn't filled with mass produced junk, the houses have character, etc. Usually there's an absence of winking irony - though not an absence of humor - and definitely nothing too extreme in terms of real world ugliness. Languid pacing. Environment often plays a part as characters cozy up in remote cabins, old houses, etc. I tend to think of '70s-'80s stuff but there's definitely arguments for earlier movies. When more recent movies start getting described as cozy is where I feel we lose the term. It starts meaning, "this movie is cozy because it is familiar to me from when I was younger and is comforting to rewatch." Even movies with zero sweaters in them.
Soot rings around the wall-mounted, corded phone. Vinyl tablecloths and peeling wallpaper. Thermals under flannels under flannels under puff parkas. One of cinema's all time greatest "little stinker" dogs. Sweet and genuine where other movies would've been way sleazier. Slow rolls its central monster mayhem but the rest of the movie is so charming you don't mind that the tentacle turtles are kind of immobile and silly looking. I'd say this is archetypal cozy horror.
Soot rings around the wall-mounted, corded phone. Vinyl tablecloths and peeling wallpaper. Thermals under flannels under flannels under puff parkas. One of cinema's all time greatest "little stinker" dogs. Sweet and genuine where other movies would've been way sleazier. Slow rolls its central monster mayhem but the rest of the movie is so charming you don't mind that the tentacle turtles are kind of immobile and silly looking. I'd say this is archetypal cozy horror.
Tristan Blyth
4.0★ · 01/28/25

My favourite line was when they said it was boogen time
My favourite line was when they said it was boogen time
Hhh
5.0★ · 08/14/24

it’s a good idea but too much of a slow burn and i started to lose interest, last 20 minutes were pretty good though and the monsters were cute kinda cute ngl
it’s a good idea but too much of a slow burn and i started to lose interest, last 20 minutes were pretty good though and the monsters were cute kinda cute ngl
Hannah
5.2★ · 08/14/24

it’s a good idea but too much of a slow burn and i started to lose interest, last 20 minutes were pretty good though and the monsters were cute kinda cute ngl
it’s a good idea but too much of a slow burn and i started to lose interest, last 20 minutes were pretty good though and the monsters were cute kinda cute ngl
Rich
5.0★ · 07/02/24

The Boogens!!! ...a title that for sure let's you know whatever you're about to watch shouldn't be taken seriously in the slightest. except the movie does take itself seriously? and it almost works? it had some fun moments. some stellar acting from the dog. it's ultimate downfall is it's snail pace and lack of boogens.
in the documentary In Search Of Darkness, it's mentioned that through most of the movie's production, they had no idea what the boogens would actually look like. hence the lack of the creature and the POV shots. though what worked for Jaws did not work for The Boogens, due to little to no suspense.
couldn't help but think of this as if harry warden from My Bloody Valentine was a slimy worm thing rather than a (somewhat rightfully) very upset bloke.
in the documentary In Search Of Darkness, it's mentioned that through most of the movie's production, they had no idea what the boogens would actually look like. hence the lack of the creature and the POV shots. though what worked for Jaws did not work for The Boogens, due to little to no suspense.
couldn't help but think of this as if harry warden from My Bloody Valentine was a slimy worm thing rather than a (somewhat rightfully) very upset bloke.
The Boogens!!! ...a title that for sure let's you know whatever you're about to watch shouldn't be taken seriously in the slightest. except the movie does take itself seriously? and it almost works? it had some fun moments. some stellar acting from the dog. it's ultimate downfall is it's snail pace and lack of boogens.
in the documentary In Search Of Darkness, it's mentioned that through most of the movie's production, they had no idea what the boogens would actually look like. hence the lack of the creature and the POV shots. though what worked for Jaws did not work for The Boogens, due to little to no suspense.
couldn't help but think of this as if harry warden from My Bloody Valentine was a slimy worm thing rather than a (somewhat rightfully) very upset bloke.
in the documentary In Search Of Darkness, it's mentioned that through most of the movie's production, they had no idea what the boogens would actually look like. hence the lack of the creature and the POV shots. though what worked for Jaws did not work for The Boogens, due to little to no suspense.
couldn't help but think of this as if harry warden from My Bloody Valentine was a slimy worm thing rather than a (somewhat rightfully) very upset bloke.