On the Basis of Sex backdrop
On the Basis of Sex logo
2018·Drama·2h
6.9
Young lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg teams with her husband Marty to bring a groundbreaking case before the U.S. Court of Appeals and overturn a century of sex discrimination.
Directed by Mimi Leder
1970s
biography
based on true story
supreme court
lawyer
justice
harvard law school
woman director
1960s
courtroom drama
supreme court justice
inspirational
instructive

Cast

Felicity Jones
Felicity Jones
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Armie Hammer
Armie Hammer
Martin D. Ginsburg
Justin Theroux
Justin Theroux
Mel Wulf
Sam Waterston
Sam Waterston
Erwin Griswold
Kathy Bates
Kathy Bates
Dorothy Kenyon
Cailee Spaeny
Cailee Spaeny
Jane C. Ginsburg
Callum Shoniker
Callum Shoniker
James Steven Ginsburg
Jack Reynor
Jack Reynor
James H. Bozarth
Stephen Root
Stephen Root
Professor Brown
Ronald Guttman
Ronald Guttman
Professor Gerald Gunther
Chris Mulkey
Chris Mulkey
Charles Moritz
Gary Werntz
Gary Werntz
Judge William Edward Doyle

Crew

Mimi Leder
Mimi Leder
Director
Mychael Danna
Mychael Danna
Original Music Composer
Michelle Tesoro
Michelle Tesoro
Editor
Jeff Skoll
Jeff Skoll
Executive Producer
Jonathan King
Jonathan King
Producer
Victoria Thomas
Victoria Thomas
Casting
Isis Mussenden
Isis Mussenden
Costume Design
Kesha
Kesha
Songs

Popular Reviews

400 reviews
Farouq
Farouq
On the Basis of Sex
A court ought not be affected by the weather of the day, but will be by the climate of the era.

A very culturally significant movie that should be seen by the youth and elderly alike. It is quite ridiculous how people today can look at the racial counterpart of this issue and be so sympathetic and stand up for the history of minorities, yet fail to see how similar that issue is to the oppression of the modern-day woman's rights.
My takeaways can be summed up by two regular, yet distinct moments in the film.

When Ruth picks up the case and goes to the ACLU office, Wulf is immediately on the defense against it. Not only does he seem to be belittling Ruth's ideas and aspirations, he doesn't even give it a chance or thought. And then when they go to step to his office, while he is spewing borderline sexist arguments, he holds the door for her. That moment right there is representative of how men thought (and still think) about their obligations to women. They hide behind chivalry and use it to prove they are doing what is best for women, they know what is best. 'See? I am holding this door for you the same way I would pull a chair for you, so I do what is best for you. So when I say you can't work and you can't go to university you should remember we know best', that little gesture during that particular conversation just sums up the entire era. He didn't necessarily mean ill towards her by rejecting the case or acting the way he did, it is just the culture that was built.
When the judges told Ruth that 'the woman stays at home and the man works and thats the way it has been for decades', they failed to see that it is this way because of the system you built. No, the woman doesn't stay at home because that is natural, she did because she was forced by the standards built by unconstitutional, unethical laws.

Judge Doyle: The word 'woman' does not appear even once in the US Constitution.
Ruth Ginsburg: Nor does the word 'freedom,' Your Honor.

Another brief moment is when Bozarth shows Professor Brown the computer room that is reading all the discriminatory laws and he says:

Without any human beings actually reading the laws.. What a horrifying age.

We have manufactured a system of justice that had the human factor stripped from it. Sure it is quicker and more efficient but it assumes times don't change. Computers take a set of instructions and run with them until they break, that's not how time works. Humans change, our values and ethics change. Sixty years later and it is still quite the horrifying age.

A beautifully chosen story told and an important message conveyed. The shots were beautiful, acting was great from the protagonists to the antagonists to the little, rebellious Cailee Spaeny who put in a commendable effort at such a young age. I am becoming quite the fan of Felicity's works.
A court ought not be affected by the weather of the day, but will be by the climate of the era.

A very culturally significant movie that should be seen by the youth and elderly alike. It is quite ridiculous how people today can look at the racial counterpart of this issue and be so sympathetic and stand up for the history of minorities, yet fail to see how similar that issue is to the oppression of the modern-day woman's rights.
My takeaways can be summed up by two regular, yet distinct moments in the film.

When Ruth picks up the case and goes to the ACLU office, Wulf is immediately on the defense against it. Not only does he seem to be belittling Ruth's ideas and aspirations, he doesn't even give it a chance or thought. And then when they go to step to his office, while he is spewing borderline sexist arguments, he holds the door for her. That moment right there is representative of how men thought (and still think) about their obligations to women. They hide behind chivalry and use it to prove they are doing what is best for women, they know what is best. 'See? I am holding this door for you the same way I would pull a chair for you, so I do what is best for you. So when I say you can't work and you can't go to university you should remember we know best', that little gesture during that particular conversation just sums up the entire era. He didn't necessarily mean ill towards her by rejecting the case or acting the way he did, it is just the culture that was built.
When the judges told Ruth that 'the woman stays at home and the man works and thats the way it has been for decades', they failed to see that it is this way because of the system you built. No, the woman doesn't stay at home because that is natural, she did because she was forced by the standards built by unconstitutional, unethical laws.

Judge Doyle: The word 'woman' does not appear even once in the US Constitution.
Ruth Ginsburg: Nor does the word 'freedom,' Your Honor.

Another brief moment is when Bozarth shows Professor Brown the computer room that is reading all the discriminatory laws and he says:

Without any human beings actually reading the laws.. What a horrifying age.

We have manufactured a system of justice that had the human factor stripped from it. Sure it is quicker and more efficient but it assumes times don't change. Computers take a set of instructions and run with them until they break, that's not how time works. Humans change, our values and ethics change. Sixty years later and it is still quite the horrifying age.

A beautifully chosen story told and an important message conveyed. The shots were beautiful, acting was great from the protagonists to the antagonists to the little, rebellious Cailee Spaeny who put in a commendable effort at such a young age. I am becoming quite the fan of Felicity's works.
Favorite
Comment
Lauren
Lauren
On the Basis of Sex
RBG legacy cooked 💔💔
RBG legacy cooked 💔💔
Favorite
Comment
ai
ai
On the Basis of Sex
what a good day to watch this in women’s month
what a good day to watch this in women’s month
Favorite
Comment
Shaurya Sheth
Shaurya Sheth
On the Basis of Sex
idk much about law yet but its pretty badass to say the law is wrong and actually be correct after everyone doubting you constantly and constantly.
idk much about law yet but its pretty badass to say the law is wrong and actually be correct after everyone doubting you constantly and constantly.
Favorite
Comment
Constable
Constable
On the Basis of Sex
The whole reason of the movie was not for ruth to be understood but to be able to see how everyone’s opinions can shape the world
The whole reason of the movie was not for ruth to be understood but to be able to see how everyone’s opinions can shape the world
Favorite
Comment