Carnal Knowledge backdrop
Carnal Knowledge logo
1971·Drama·1h 38m
7.1
Two lifelong friends navigate complex sexual encounters and emotional entanglements, wrestling with societal norms and personal desires.
Directed by Mike Nichols
infidelity
new york city
eroticism
coming of age
friends
extramarital affair
sexual confusion
sexual awakening
college friends
college roommate
comedy of manners

Cast

Jack Nicholson
Jack Nicholson
Jonathan
Candice Bergen
Candice Bergen
Susan
Art Garfunkel
Art Garfunkel
Sandy
Ann-Margret
Ann-Margret
Bobbie
Rita Moreno
Rita Moreno
Louise
Carol Kane
Carol Kane
Jennifer

Crew

Mike Nichols
Mike Nichols
Director
Giuseppe Rotunno
Giuseppe Rotunno
Director of Photography
Mike Nichols
Mike Nichols
Producer
Joseph E. Levine
Joseph E. Levine
Executive Producer
Mary Ellen Mark
Mary Ellen Mark
Still Photographer
Sydney Guilaroff
Sydney Guilaroff
Hairstylist
Joseph E. Levine
Joseph E. Levine
Presenter
Charles H. Schram
Charles H. Schram
Makeup Supervisor

Popular Reviews

136 reviews
Joseph
Joseph
Carnal Knowledge
Mike Nichols was clearly fascinated by desire. Carnal Knowledge explores the selfish, lust-driven, and objectifying impulses we often ignore or push aside. What stood out to me most is how the film functions as a slow realisation that the male gaze particularly in relation to sex can feel like the central organising force of life. Desire, conquest, and fantasy promise fulfillment, but once that mindset is tested within the reality of a sustained relationship, its limitations become clear. Intimacy and emotional connection begin to hold greater value, not because the characters consciously grow, but because their earlier fixation on sex proves increasingly inadequate over time.It’s also an under appreciated performance from Jack Nicholson; I don’t think I would have enjoyed the film nearly as much without him.
Mike Nichols was clearly fascinated by desire. Carnal Knowledge explores the selfish, lust-driven, and objectifying impulses we often ignore or push aside. What stood out to me most is how the film functions as a slow realisation that the male gaze particularly in relation to sex can feel like the central organising force of life. Desire, conquest, and fantasy promise fulfillment, but once that mindset is tested within the reality of a sustained relationship, its limitations become clear. Intimacy and emotional connection begin to hold greater value, not because the characters consciously grow, but because their earlier fixation on sex proves increasingly inadequate over time.It’s also an under appreciated performance from Jack Nicholson; I don’t think I would have enjoyed the film nearly as much without him.
Favorite
1
love
Comment
Arlo
Arlo
Carnal Knowledge
"I don't feel like something. I feel like nothing"

I finally watched Carnal Knowledge, and as my first film from Mike Nichols, I thoroughly enjoyed it. It’s a sharp, uncomfortable, and often fascinating look at desire, intimacy, and the way people’s relationships with sex and love evolve over the years. The film feels incredibly honest at times, even when the characters are being deeply frustrating.
Unsurprisingly, Jack Nicholson is fantastic here, charismatic, funny, and often unsettling. More surprising to me was how good Art Garfunkel is. He brings a quiet vulnerability that balances Nicholson’s energy really well, and the dynamic between the two carries the film.
It’s not always an easy watch, but it’s a really interesting insight into desire and how it changes throughout the years. Definitely worth the watch.
"I don't feel like something. I feel like nothing"

I finally watched Carnal Knowledge, and as my first film from Mike Nichols, I thoroughly enjoyed it. It’s a sharp, uncomfortable, and often fascinating look at desire, intimacy, and the way people’s relationships with sex and love evolve over the years. The film feels incredibly honest at times, even when the characters are being deeply frustrating.
Unsurprisingly, Jack Nicholson is fantastic here, charismatic, funny, and often unsettling. More surprising to me was how good Art Garfunkel is. He brings a quiet vulnerability that balances Nicholson’s energy really well, and the dynamic between the two carries the film.
It’s not always an easy watch, but it’s a really interesting insight into desire and how it changes throughout the years. Definitely worth the watch.
Favorite
Comment
Alice
Alice
Carnal Knowledge
Ew men
Ew men
Favorite
Comment
Treyward
Treyward
Carnal Knowledge
***Jonathan: Do you always answer a question with a question?
Susan: Do you always date your best friend's girlfriend?***

Feels a lot looser than what I’ve come to expect from Nichols. But it works in order to paint a portrait of a man who uses women to avoid doing any basic self introspection.
***Jonathan: Do you always answer a question with a question?
Susan: Do you always date your best friend's girlfriend?***

Feels a lot looser than what I’ve come to expect from Nichols. But it works in order to paint a portrait of a man who uses women to avoid doing any basic self introspection.
Favorite
Comment
Matt Sulla
Matt Sulla
Carnal Knowledge
For as much as I love Jack and I think he was amazing in this film, Ann-Margret was easily my favorite performance here. Her pain in her scenes as well as her facial expressions were so good. The bedroom fight scene made this movie fully worth it. Really like this one and always like seeing early stages of Jack. 83/100
For as much as I love Jack and I think he was amazing in this film, Ann-Margret was easily my favorite performance here. Her pain in her scenes as well as her facial expressions were so good. The bedroom fight scene made this movie fully worth it. Really like this one and always like seeing early stages of Jack. 83/100
Favorite
Comment