The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman backdrop
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman logo
1974·Drama·1h 52m
7.1
In February, 1962, as the civil rights movement reaches Bayonne, Louisiana, a New York journalist arrives to interview Jane Pittman, who has just turned 110. She tells him her story dating back to her earliest memories before slavery ended. In between the chapters of her life, the present-day struggles of Blacks in Bayonne, urged on by Jimmy, are dramatized.
Directed by John Korty
based on novel or book
southern usa
slavery
plantation
interracial relationship
racism

Cast

Cicely Tyson
Cicely Tyson
Jane Pittman
Eric Brown
Eric Brown
Jimmy (age 7)
Richard Dysart
Richard Dysart
Master Bryant
Joel Fluellen
Joel Fluellen
Unc Isom
Will Hare
Will Hare
Elbert Cluveau
Katherine Helmond
Katherine Helmond
Lady at House
Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
Quentin Lerner
Odetta
Odetta
Big Laura
Rod Perry
Rod Perry
Joe Pittman
Roy Poole
Roy Poole
Mister Robert
Thalmus Rasulala
Thalmus Rasulala
Ned (age 42)
Carol Sutton
Carol Sutton
Vivian

Crew

John Korty
John Korty
Director
Fred Karlin
Fred Karlin
Original Music Composer
Rick Baker
Rick Baker
Makeup Artist
Stan Winston
Stan Winston
Makeup Supervisor
Stan Winston
Stan Winston
Makeup Effects

Popular Reviews

5 reviews
kieryae
kieryae
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
**"none of my sons or daughters will be a ngga"***

A touching fictional story-- truly moving and inspiring. from a film aspect, the movie lacked depth and dragged on for entirely too long. Definitely can tell it was made for television.
**"none of my sons or daughters will be a ngga"***

A touching fictional story-- truly moving and inspiring. from a film aspect, the movie lacked depth and dragged on for entirely too long. Definitely can tell it was made for television.
Favorite
Comment
David S
David S
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
This is an adaptation of the novel by Ernest J. Gaines. I think that if you’ve never read that novel this might come off as a really great film for its time. But seeing as though I’ve read the book I think this film is a huge disservice to it and the black community. Do not get me wrong I think the film is okay and it was important that it was seen by tv audiences in the mid 70s. However, the changes made from book to film are detrimental to the film and borderline whitewashing and I really don’t like that. I’d almost put this in the blaxploitation film category because of the changes made. 

One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.

I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
This is an adaptation of the novel by Ernest J. Gaines. I think that if you’ve never read that novel this might come off as a really great film for its time. But seeing as though I’ve read the book I think this film is a huge disservice to it and the black community. Do not get me wrong I think the film is okay and it was important that it was seen by tv audiences in the mid 70s. However, the changes made from book to film are detrimental to the film and borderline whitewashing and I really don’t like that. I’d almost put this in the blaxploitation film category because of the changes made. 

One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.

I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
Favorite
Comment
meow
meow
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
Favorite
Comment
Chelsea
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
Favorite
Comment
Ash Kanuru
Ash Kanuru
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
Favorite
Comment