

1974·Drama·1h 52m
7.1
★




In February, 1962, as the civil rights movement reaches Bayonne, Louisiana, a New York journalist arrives to interview Jane Pittman, who has just turned 110. She tells him her story dating back to her earliest memories before slavery ended. In between the chapters of her life, the present-day struggles of Blacks in Bayonne, urged on by Jimmy, are dramatized.
Directed by John Korty
based on novel or book
southern usa
slavery
plantation
interracial relationship
racism

IMDB
N/A
Where to Watch



Cast

Cicely Tyson
Jane Pittman

Eric Brown
Jimmy (age 7)

Richard Dysart
Master Bryant

Joel Fluellen
Unc Isom

Will Hare
Elbert Cluveau

Katherine Helmond
Lady at House

Michael Murphy
Quentin Lerner

Odetta
Big Laura

Rod Perry
Joe Pittman

Roy Poole
Mister Robert

Thalmus Rasulala
Ned (age 42)

Carol Sutton
Vivian
Crew

John Korty
Director

Fred Karlin
Original Music Composer

Rick Baker
Makeup Artist

Stan Winston
Makeup Supervisor

Stan Winston
Makeup Effects
Popular Reviews
5 reviews
kieryae
7.0★ · 02/18/25

**"none of my sons or daughters will be a ngga"***
A touching fictional story-- truly moving and inspiring. from a film aspect, the movie lacked depth and dragged on for entirely too long. Definitely can tell it was made for television.
**"none of my sons or daughters will be a ngga"***
A touching fictional story-- truly moving and inspiring. from a film aspect, the movie lacked depth and dragged on for entirely too long. Definitely can tell it was made for television.
David S
5.0★ · 02/19/24

This is an adaptation of the novel by Ernest J. Gaines. I think that if you’ve never read that novel this might come off as a really great film for its time. But seeing as though I’ve read the book I think this film is a huge disservice to it and the black community. Do not get me wrong I think the film is okay and it was important that it was seen by tv audiences in the mid 70s. However, the changes made from book to film are detrimental to the film and borderline whitewashing and I really don’t like that. I’d almost put this in the blaxploitation film category because of the changes made.
One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.
I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.
I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
This is an adaptation of the novel by Ernest J. Gaines. I think that if you’ve never read that novel this might come off as a really great film for its time. But seeing as though I’ve read the book I think this film is a huge disservice to it and the black community. Do not get me wrong I think the film is okay and it was important that it was seen by tv audiences in the mid 70s. However, the changes made from book to film are detrimental to the film and borderline whitewashing and I really don’t like that. I’d almost put this in the blaxploitation film category because of the changes made.
One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.
I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
One of the biggest issues I had was changing the narrator from a racially ambiguous but most likely black school teacher to a white reporter from New York. It really makes it seem like whit people wanted to put their stamp of approval on this story in order for it to be more widely accepted by the public. I didn’t enjoy that. They also removed an entire section of the book that involved interracial relationships. I understand it isn’t essential to Jane’s story and the runtime for a tv movie is only so long but it was an important part of the book and it felt intentionally left out.
I think the technical aspects were okay for the budget it obviously had and Cicely Tyson was incredible as Jane. The ending wasn’t accurate to the book and I think that lack of ambiguity harmed the ending a little. I do think they had some missed opportunities but I’m glad the story as a whole got to be seen.
meow
7.0★ · 03/28/23

Chelsea
8.0★ · 09/16/22

Ash Kanuru
8.0★ · 02/10/22
