it was good but i kinda expected more since everyone was going on about how it’s the greatest movie oat. mia wallace intrigued me but i got kinda bored after her story was over.

it was good but i kinda expected more since everyone was going on about how it’s the greatest movie oat. mia wallace intrigued me but i got kinda bored after her story was over.

controversial opinion: this is ok

controversial opinion: this is ok

i really wanted to like this more, but unfortunately this was mid for me.

some really good dialogue, but also some really drawn out dialogue that’s just not interesting. a monologue here and there is great, but there were too many and I found myself struggling to pay attention.

plot wise, the most entertaining parts are in the first two parts. the third part was so uninteresting for me. the whole car cleaning plot was so long, and i was just waiting for it to go somewhere, and it didn’t. when you have such exciting scenes in the film in the middle, you really ought to make the ending top it somehow.

i respect the artistic choice to split up the film in this way. it’s clearly a cult classic, so i’m sure i’m missing something, but i didn’t think it did much for the story.

i think there is some subtext in what Samuel L Jackson is saying and why he chooses to not kill the robber, but i’m struggling to make sense of it. would love to read a review of someone who loved this film

i really wanted to like this more, but unfortunately this was mid for me.

some really good dialogue, but also some really drawn out dialogue that’s just not interesting. a monologue here and there is great, but there were too many and I found myself struggling to pay attention.

plot wise, the most entertaining parts are in the first two parts. the third part was so uninteresting for me. the whole car cleaning plot was so long, and i was just waiting for it to go somewhere, and it didn’t. when you have such exciting scenes in the film in the middle, you really ought to make the ending top it somehow.

i respect the artistic choice to split up the film in this way. it’s clearly a cult classic, so i’m sure i’m missing something, but i didn’t think it did much for the story.

i think there is some subtext in what Samuel L Jackson is saying and why he chooses to not kill the robber, but i’m struggling to make sense of it. would love to read a review of someone who loved this film

Maybe I’m just not educated enough or stupid or something but this movie is mid as hell. I wouldn’t say I’m the hugest fan of Tarantino movies besides a select few, but I always find his movies to be extra extra drawn out. Don’t get me wrong, Tarantino is a legend at storytelling and really knows how to encapsulate a fictitious world but his movies are so scatterbrained. It’s like watching a kid with ADHD try to make a movie. Like this one goes forward and backwards in time multiple times the whole thing got muddled for me. By the end, I forgot the wife character ODed because it didn’t matter in the end. I found it more a criminal comedy than anything else, there are some really iconic and funny lines scattered throughout but in the end it is not and should not bec considered a masterpiece. Everyone just overglazes it because it’s Tarantino. Like you can’t say this movie is iconic when a good portion of the movie no one ever talks about, the whole boxer arc never gets mentioned when this movie is talked about, it’s on the beginning and the end. It’s like 45 minutes of the movie is forgotten which in my opinion isn’t the making of a good flick.

Maybe I’m just not educated enough or stupid or something but this movie is mid as hell. I wouldn’t say I’m the hugest fan of Tarantino movies besides a select few, but I always find his movies to be extra extra drawn out. Don’t get me wrong, Tarantino is a legend at storytelling and really knows how to encapsulate a fictitious world but his movies are so scatterbrained. It’s like watching a kid with ADHD try to make a movie. Like this one goes forward and backwards in time multiple times the whole thing got muddled for me. By the end, I forgot the wife character ODed because it didn’t matter in the end. I found it more a criminal comedy than anything else, there are some really iconic and funny lines scattered throughout but in the end it is not and should not bec considered a masterpiece. Everyone just overglazes it because it’s Tarantino. Like you can’t say this movie is iconic when a good portion of the movie no one ever talks about, the whole boxer arc never gets mentioned when this movie is talked about, it’s on the beginning and the end. It’s like 45 minutes of the movie is forgotten which in my opinion isn’t the making of a good flick.

honestly the best example of making sure the audience can tell the characters have had a life before the movie starts, feels so hectic in a good way, also kind of love how it goes back in the plot to tell a different side of things and leave it on a better note 

weird first impression of tarantino though why is everyone so racist in this movie

honestly the best example of making sure the audience can tell the characters have had a life before the movie starts, feels so hectic in a good way, also kind of love how it goes back in the plot to tell a different side of things and leave it on a better note 

weird first impression of tarantino though why is everyone so racist in this movie